Skip to main content

Tuggerah hair salon's male owner and senior male employee sexually harassed and victimised apprentice

A young male hairdressing trainee has been awarded $30,000 after a tribunal accepted he had been sexually harassed and victimised by senior males at a salon, including being told “hairdressers are like racehorses, they need a pat on the bum to go faster”.

Arthur Kordas spent less than three months as a trainee at Aztec Hair and Beauty at Tuggerah but experienced sexual harassment and victimisation that had “a significant impact” on him, the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal found.

Mr Kordas was awarded $15,000 for sexual harassment by a senior salon employee and the salon manager between November 2014 and February, 2015, and $15,000 for victimisation after he complained about the harassment.

Mr Kordas was sacked after he broke down at work on February 11, 2015. It followed two incidents in which senior employee Dean Eaton grabbed him around the waist from behind, once in front of customers, with both occasions witnessed by salon manager Sayeed Rony.

Mr Kordas later told Mr Rony “This sexual harassment has to stop”, but days later Mr Rony said he had “spoken with the team and I’m going to have to let you go”.

Mr Rony or a representative failed to appear at several tribunal hearing dates after earlier denying the sexual harassment and victimisation allegations.

The tribunal heard that Mr Kordas felt uncomfortable during his first week at the salon when Mr Rony lightly stroked his palm after giving him money to buy items for the salon.

A month after he started work as a trainee Mr Eaton told customers that he and Mr Kordas were “like a gay couple. We argue like a gay couple. We’re close”.

Mr Kordas said this made him feel embarrassed and humiliated, but he said nothing because he wanted to keep his job.

On another occasion Mr Eaton slapped Mr Kordas on the bottom in front of another employee and said: “You should slap me on the bum. I like being slapped on the bum.”

On another occasion Mr Eaton agreed that he got on with Mr Kordas “because you’re my bitch”.

In a discussion after Mr Rony accused Mr Kordas of “not smiling anymore”, the trainee angrily responded that he was being underpaid and harassed by three staff members, including Mr Eaton.

Later that day Mr Rony told Mr Kordas: “I'm sorry about what happened before. Hairdressers are like racehorses. They're all equal, but they need a pat on the bum to go faster.”

The tribunal accepted evidence from a psychologist and doctor that Mr Kordas had “done all the right things” to try to remain employed but was left “humiliated, distressed and out of employment” as a result of the sexual harassment and victimisation.

The company Ruba and Jo Pty Ltd, trading as Aztec Hair and Beauty, was ordered to pay Mr Kordas $30,000 within 21 days of the decision on Thursday. The figure included $10,000 for sexual harassment by Mr Eaton, $5000 for sexual harassment by Mr Rony and $15,000 for victimisation.

AWPTI - workplace investigation Sydney and through-out NSW, QLD and Victoria. Workplace training national wide


Misconduct investigations, bullying investigations, harassment investigations & sexual harassment investigations, complaint investigations, grievance investigations, discrimination investigations
www.awpti.com.au
http://awpti.com.au/investigations/

Originally published at - http://www.theherald.com.au/story/4686413/male-hairdresser-wins-30000-sexual-harassment-case/


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lorna Jane vindicated after two-year, $570,000 bullying case

Legal experts are urging businesses to train their staff in up-to-date social media policies this year, after activewear brand Lorna Jane won a two-year legal battle in November against a former employee who claimed the company was responsible for the psychiatric impacts of bullying at work. Former Brisbane store manager Amy Robinson filed a legal claim against Lorna Jane in 2015, seeking $570,000 in damages. The former manager claimed Lorna Jane was negligent and should be held responsible for her being bullied by a learning and development manager at the company, which led to psychiatric illness and a loss of employment and future employability. The company came out swinging against the claims early on,   posting a later-deleted Facebook post in 2015 defending itself against the claims  and saying it had been “very disappointed” by what had been reported in the media about the case. The claims included that Robinson was bullied and called a variety of names while...

Recent decisions at the Fair Work Commission

Knowledge is power when it comes to managing claims risk Unfair dismissal applications are all too common and employers regularly find themselves in hot water when they are on the receiving end of one. Whilst the outcome of every unfair dismissal case tends to turn on its own individual merits, opportunities to learn and refresh one’s knowledge consistently arise – and knowledge is power when it comes to managing claims risk. To assist you in managing your unfair dismissal claims risk, this article set out some important lessons and reminders compiled from a number of recent unfair dismissal decisions made by the Fair Work Commission. If an employee has “gotten away” with certain conduct in the past, it can be difficult to later justify their dismissal for such conduct. In West v Holcim (Australia) Pty Ltd [2017] FWC 2346, the applicant employee allowed a casual labour hire worker to operate a crane without adequate supervision. This was despite the fact that the labour hire wo...
The serious threat SMEs are ignoring: One in two small businesses don’t have a policy for bullying claims One in two small businesses do not know how they would respond if bullying allegations were raised by their staff, according to new research, leaving them open to significant costs and productivity issues. But workplace experts say these concerns can be prevented with forward planning A survey of 400 businesses from employment relations advisory Employsure found one in two Australian small businesses don’t have a “defined action plan” for when bullying is raised at work, with many unaware that they could face costs related to dispute resolution or even penalties relating to bullying cases in some states. The research, which surveyed businesses with up to 15 employees, found those businesses with between two and four employees were the most likely to be unaware of best practice processes for dealing with bullying claims, with only 40% of businesses saying they know the st...