Skip to main content
The serious threat SMEs are ignoring: One in two small businesses don’t have a policy for bullying claims

One in two small businesses do not know how they would respond if bullying allegations were raised by their staff, according to new research, leaving them open to significant costs and productivity issues.
But workplace experts say these concerns can be prevented with forward planning
A survey of 400 businesses from employment relations advisory Employsure found one in two Australian small businesses don’t have a “defined action plan” for when bullying is raised at work, with many unaware that they could face costs related to dispute resolution or even penalties relating to bullying cases in some states.
The research, which surveyed businesses with up to 15 employees, found those businesses with between two and four employees were the most likely to be unaware of best practice processes for dealing with bullying claims, with only 40% of businesses saying they know the steps they would take to address concerns about bullying within their businesses.
Employsure figures suggest businesses spend between $17,000 and $24,000, on average, to resolve a bullying case.
These figures include legal costs associated with having a matter heard by the Fair Work Commission, as well as staff absenteeism, but exclude any potential penalties imposed on the employer.
Senior workplace relations adviser at Employsure, Josh Vikis, says too many business owners are “busy running their businesses” and leave themselves vulnerable by not having bullying policies in place.
While too many haven’t thought about the fallout if serious allegations are raised, there are key steps a company can take to ensure staff are aware of expectations around behaviour, and that employees know where to go to raise issues, Employsure says.
These include having a formal ‘bullying and harassment’ policy at work, communicating reporting procedures to staff, and making sure everyone in the business knows how a claim will be responded to once it is made.
Senior workplace relations adviser at Employsure Harry Hilliar says because workplace safety regulations differ between Australian states, business owners should visit their state’s workplace safety regulator website for further information about workplace bullying.
When developing policies around workplace culture, it’s critical that small businesses get staff involved in developing and communicating these expectations, he says.
“The fundamental part of this is around consultation with workers, and having an open conversation about standards expected,” he says.
If a business is too small to have a formal occupational health and safety committee or other representative who takes care of workplace culture, it’s a good idea to bring in external help, he says.
“In a sense when it comes to very small businesses, the relationships within these are just critical — so bring someone else in you can ask.”

Take steps to keep a team strong through conflict

Leadership expert Pollyanna Lenkic says that when it comes to many kinds of conflict at work, businesses can develop plans to help resolve concerns without situations becoming a drain on the productivity of other staff.
It’s important for small businesses to understand that just because they are tight-knit teams, it doesn’t mean they are safe from disharmony or bullying claims, Lenkic says.
“Sometimes being in a small environment makes it harder to get respite, and you [as a staff member] can also feel at greater risk,” she says of conflict in small businesses. 
However, business owners that focus on communication and the best outcomes for the team tend to do better at resolving concerns, she says.
The first thing an SME owner can do to help resolve bullying and other concerns smoothly is to face any problems head-on.
“The first thing is you can’t avoid the situation, because the natural tendency is to avoid [talking] about it. But if you’ve got a framework for this, and a good support mechanism, then that’s key,” Lenkic says. 
While many small businesses are reluctant to call upon external experts, Lenkic says it can be helpful to have a workplace adviser or external facilitator available to help resolve disputes, as they can often help staff discuss concerns while bringing in an independent perspective.
“This approach can be incredibly powerful, because I’ve seen time and time again how people within a business can be locked into one perspective,” she says.
Thirdly, small businesses should develop a plan for the first steps the company will take when faced with a claim of conflict or bullying, with Lenkic suggesting the focus should remain on how behaviour affects the team, rather than just focusing on the emotions of individuals involved.
“We also sometimes need to look at what the team needs,” she says.

Originally published at the Smartcompany.com
https://www.smartcompany.com.au/people-human-resources/the-serious-threat-smes-are-ignoring-why-one-in-two-businesses-dont-have-a-policy-for-bullying-claims/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unfair dismissal – harsh to dismiss, however reinstatement not appropriate

In the recent decision of  Paul Johnson v BHP Billiton Olympic Dam Corporation Pty Ltd  [2017] FWC 4097, Commissioner Hampton found that, although the employee had engaged in misconduct constituting a valid reason for dismissal, the dismissal was nevertheless harsh due to a number of mitigating factors. However, the Commissioner did not consider reinstatement appropriate because the employer had a rational basis for its loss of trust and confidence in the employee given the importance of the need for compliance with safety policy and the maintenance of appropriate discipline in connection with workplace health and safety matters. The employee was instead awarded compensation. The facts The employee was employed by BHPB from 24 May 2001 until his dismissal on 31 March 2017. At the time of his dismissal, the employee was a process specialist, responsible for a team of technicians looking after a flash furnace and other equipment in areas of a smelting facility at an und...

Workplace Investigation biased process

The presence of bias be it actual or perceived during an investigation can derail the investigation and undermine any findings and recommendations. Complaint of bias are often raised relating to two areas, the investigation process itself or the investigation interviews. This article will examine the process, part two will examine bias during interviews. Workplace investigations are defined as  "an unbiased gathering of evidence"  and to ensure that that a complaint of bias is not raised or substantiated it is important to follow these rules; Approach the investigation with an open mind. Do no make any judgements on the parties Do not make any judgements on the truthfulness of any of the parties versions of events until all the evidence has been gathered. Gather all the evidence, not just the evidence that supports the complaint Do not form a theory and then seek evidence to support your theory only Do not make early determinations If you feel that you ...

Violence Valid Ground for Dismissal

Violence Valid Ground for Dismissal The Fair Work Commission (in the case of  Sekirski v Scope (Vic) Ltd [2017] FWC 1200 ) has found that an employee who assaulted a co-worker by striking her in the face was validly dismissed.  Stif Sekirski commenced employment as a Disability Support Worker with Scope (Vic) Ltd in November 2014.  Mr Sekirski’s employment was terminated on 2 September 2016 on grounds of serious misconduct. It was alleged that Mr Sekirski punched a co-worker in the face, then called her a bit** and threw a chair in her direction.  The FWC was satisfied that this conduct had occurred, and held that this conduct provided Scope with a valid reason to terminate Mr Sekirski’s employment. It is important that when confronted with matters involving violence in the workplace employers ensure that they conduct a timely and thorough investigation.   We recommend that even if summary dismissal is a likely outcome you should s...