Skip to main content

Grabbing an Employee and Sexually Propositioning her was Valid Reason for Dismissal

Grabbing an Employee and Sexually Propositioning her was Valid Reason for Dismissal
The Fair Work Commission dismissed a former Calvary Hospital office worker’s application for an unfair dismissal remedy
Andrew Powell commenced employment with Calvary Public Hospital in an administrative role in September 2014. On 26 May 2016, Mr Powell was suspended without pay pending an investigation into allegations of serious misconduct. 
It was alleged that Mr Powell physically assaulted Ms Hacker, by “forcefully grabbing her by the arm and subsequently placing his hands on her hips and propositioning her by suggesting that they ‘catch up’ on the weekend.” On 9 June, Calvary Hospital appointed  an external investigator to consider the allegations. 
The investigation determined that there was enough evidence to form the opinion that Mr Powell sexually harassed Ms Hacker by subjecting her to unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature. Further, it was found that Mr Powell’s conduct breached Calvary Health Care A.C.T.’s Code of Conduct, Calvary Health Care’s Workplace Behaviour Policy and Procedure and section 9(f) of the Public Sector Management Act 1994.

Mr Powell was issued with a show cause letter and provided with an opportunity to respond. On 5 August 2016, Mr Powell’s employment was terminated.
Deputy President John Kovacic found, on the balance of probabilities, Mr Powell did engage in serious misconduct by grabbing and propositioning Ms Hacker. This supported the finding that there was a valid reason to terminate Mr Powell’s employment. Deputy President Kovacic concluded that Mr Powell’s dismissal was not harsh, unjust or unreasonable and dismissed the application.
This is an example of how an investigation can ensure you have the evidence to back up your decision to dismiss and employee.  Australian workplace Training & Investigation (AWPTI) can assist with investigation services, the cost of an investigation will in many cases be far the less than the cost of not doing one and the cost of the stress of having to defend your actions without evidence
AWPTI - workplace investigation Sydney and through-out NSW, QLD and Victoria. Workplace training national wide


Misconduct investigations, bullying investigations, harassment investigations & sexual harassment investigations, complaint investigations, grievance investigations, discrimination investigations
www.awpti.com.au
http://awpti.com.au/investigations/




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lorna Jane vindicated after two-year, $570,000 bullying case

Legal experts are urging businesses to train their staff in up-to-date social media policies this year, after activewear brand Lorna Jane won a two-year legal battle in November against a former employee who claimed the company was responsible for the psychiatric impacts of bullying at work. Former Brisbane store manager Amy Robinson filed a legal claim against Lorna Jane in 2015, seeking $570,000 in damages. The former manager claimed Lorna Jane was negligent and should be held responsible for her being bullied by a learning and development manager at the company, which led to psychiatric illness and a loss of employment and future employability. The company came out swinging against the claims early on,   posting a later-deleted Facebook post in 2015 defending itself against the claims  and saying it had been “very disappointed” by what had been reported in the media about the case. The claims included that Robinson was bullied and called a variety of names while...

Recent decisions at the Fair Work Commission

Knowledge is power when it comes to managing claims risk Unfair dismissal applications are all too common and employers regularly find themselves in hot water when they are on the receiving end of one. Whilst the outcome of every unfair dismissal case tends to turn on its own individual merits, opportunities to learn and refresh one’s knowledge consistently arise – and knowledge is power when it comes to managing claims risk. To assist you in managing your unfair dismissal claims risk, this article set out some important lessons and reminders compiled from a number of recent unfair dismissal decisions made by the Fair Work Commission. If an employee has “gotten away” with certain conduct in the past, it can be difficult to later justify their dismissal for such conduct. In West v Holcim (Australia) Pty Ltd [2017] FWC 2346, the applicant employee allowed a casual labour hire worker to operate a crane without adequate supervision. This was despite the fact that the labour hire wo...
The serious threat SMEs are ignoring: One in two small businesses don’t have a policy for bullying claims One in two small businesses do not know how they would respond if bullying allegations were raised by their staff, according to new research, leaving them open to significant costs and productivity issues. But workplace experts say these concerns can be prevented with forward planning A survey of 400 businesses from employment relations advisory Employsure found one in two Australian small businesses don’t have a “defined action plan” for when bullying is raised at work, with many unaware that they could face costs related to dispute resolution or even penalties relating to bullying cases in some states. The research, which surveyed businesses with up to 15 employees, found those businesses with between two and four employees were the most likely to be unaware of best practice processes for dealing with bullying claims, with only 40% of businesses saying they know the st...