Skip to main content

Study uncovers 22 types of workplace bullying

Subtle, negative types of behaviour that threaten staff engagement and cause absenteeism are slipping under the radar and deserve more attention from HR, research shows.
Researchers studied 500 Australian employees over a 12-month period, and their report identifies 22 distinct experiences or acts of bullying in the workplace:
  1. Withholding information;
  2. Humiliation/ridicule;
  3. Allocating work below the person's level of competence;
  4. Removing responsibility;
  5. Gossip/rumours;
  6. Ignoring/exclusion;
  7. Personal insults;
  8. Shouting;
  9. Intimidating behaviour;
  10. Hints/signals to quit the job;
  11. Reminders of errors/mistakes;
  12. Ignoring/hostile reactions;
  13. Persistent criticism;
  14. Opinions ignored;
  15. Practical jokes;
  16. Unreasonable deadlines;
  17. Making allegations;
  18. Excessive monitoring of work;
  19. Pressure to not claim entitlements;
  20. Excessive teasing;
  21. Unreasonable workloads; and
  22. Threats of violence/abuse and actual abuse.
They found these negative acts appeared across five distinct subtypes of workplace bullying, which they identified as: no bullying; limited indirect bullying; task-related bullying; occasional bullying; and frequent bullying, all of which were linked to absenteeism via physical and mental health problems and lower work engagement.
Co-author of the report, and associate professor at the University of Wollongong's School of Psychology, Christopher Magee says when people think about bullying in the workplace they tend to think of violence and aggression. "That's actually not that common," he says. "It's all these subtle types like ignoring people or micro-managing. When we look at all these covert types, I guess it's not that surprising that it's happening quite regularly."
Whereas previous studies have asked workers, 'have you been bullied?', this study looked into these specific and indirect acts of bullying. What it found was bullying occurred in a number of ways and at different frequencies. No bullying, for example, was characterised by a very low frequency of workplace bullying experiences, whereas task-related bullying occurred when someone had few instances of person-related bullying (hints/signals to quit job, practical jokes, excessive teasing and threats of violence/abuse and actual abuse) but occasional experiences of things like withholding information, reminders of errors/mistakes and their opinions ignored.
Magee told HR Daily it's important for employers to make very clear what types of behaviours are not acceptable in the workplace. "A lot of organisations have policies around workplace bullying but they're very vague and unclear, so when it does occur there's not a lot they can do to hold people to account," he says. "When bullying does occur it's important that an organisation actually acts and is proactive in responding to it."
But he says while the research is helpful for HR professionals in preventing and managing workplace bullying, it's not always useful to label all these acts as bullying. "It's more a matter of, 'this is stuff that's not accepted in the workplace'. There can be a stigma associated with bullying but certainly this shows there's some issues with the workplace culture that might need to be addressed."
Because some acts of bullying are particularly subtle, they can also slip under the radar. "People think these behaviours don't have much of an impact," Magee says. "Our research shows that even people experiencing the most subtle kinds of bullying are not as happy in the workplace or psychologically well.
"What happens with those more subtle types of bullying is they can escalate over time into more severe bullying."
Magee says organisations should focus on building a positive workplace, and encourage leadership that is transformational rather than transactional by giving people positive feedback, autonomy, and the resources to do their job.
Despite being quite common, one thing that can trigger workplace bullying is organisational restructure, he adds. "The way that some people handle or respond to that uncertainty is by lashing out at other people or becoming more competitive and that can lead to a negative workplace and foster bullying over time."
Magee says the answer is for HR to see this type of behaviour as an organisational issue and not put the blame on individuals.
"It's really important that organisations step in and do something about it. Good, strong leadership and communication are things that can really help during times of uncertainty."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lorna Jane vindicated after two-year, $570,000 bullying case

Legal experts are urging businesses to train their staff in up-to-date social media policies this year, after activewear brand Lorna Jane won a two-year legal battle in November against a former employee who claimed the company was responsible for the psychiatric impacts of bullying at work. Former Brisbane store manager Amy Robinson filed a legal claim against Lorna Jane in 2015, seeking $570,000 in damages. The former manager claimed Lorna Jane was negligent and should be held responsible for her being bullied by a learning and development manager at the company, which led to psychiatric illness and a loss of employment and future employability. The company came out swinging against the claims early on,   posting a later-deleted Facebook post in 2015 defending itself against the claims  and saying it had been “very disappointed” by what had been reported in the media about the case. The claims included that Robinson was bullied and called a variety of names while...

Recent decisions at the Fair Work Commission

Knowledge is power when it comes to managing claims risk Unfair dismissal applications are all too common and employers regularly find themselves in hot water when they are on the receiving end of one. Whilst the outcome of every unfair dismissal case tends to turn on its own individual merits, opportunities to learn and refresh one’s knowledge consistently arise – and knowledge is power when it comes to managing claims risk. To assist you in managing your unfair dismissal claims risk, this article set out some important lessons and reminders compiled from a number of recent unfair dismissal decisions made by the Fair Work Commission. If an employee has “gotten away” with certain conduct in the past, it can be difficult to later justify their dismissal for such conduct. In West v Holcim (Australia) Pty Ltd [2017] FWC 2346, the applicant employee allowed a casual labour hire worker to operate a crane without adequate supervision. This was despite the fact that the labour hire wo...
The serious threat SMEs are ignoring: One in two small businesses don’t have a policy for bullying claims One in two small businesses do not know how they would respond if bullying allegations were raised by their staff, according to new research, leaving them open to significant costs and productivity issues. But workplace experts say these concerns can be prevented with forward planning A survey of 400 businesses from employment relations advisory Employsure found one in two Australian small businesses don’t have a “defined action plan” for when bullying is raised at work, with many unaware that they could face costs related to dispute resolution or even penalties relating to bullying cases in some states. The research, which surveyed businesses with up to 15 employees, found those businesses with between two and four employees were the most likely to be unaware of best practice processes for dealing with bullying claims, with only 40% of businesses saying they know the st...