Skip to main content

Former health boss Jane Holden appeals against unfair dismissal ruling

Former public hospital boss Jane Holden has launched an appeal against the Supreme Court’s dismissal of her $2 million unfair sacking claim.

Ms Holden was dismissed as the acting chief executive of Tasmanian Health Organisation South in 2014, soon after the release of a Tasmanian Integrity Commission report into the health system.

Ms Holden sued the State Government, seeking payment equal to the balance of her five-year contract, plus for another five-year term, equal to nearly $2 million.

Earlier this month, Justice Shan Tennent ruled in the Government’s favour, dismissing Ms Holden’s claim in its entirety and ordering she pay the Government’s costs of defending the civil action.

Ms Holden’s legal team claimed she was sacked as a result of findings made by the Integrity Commission.

Ms Holden rejected those findings when she gave evidence during her week-long civil case last year. She was made redundant with a $211,000 severance payment by Health Minister 

Michael Ferguson in June 2014, three months after an Integrity Commission Report was released.

Ms Holden said her reputation was damaged by her sacking and its subsequent publicity.
After applying for numerous jobs, she said she was only able to find a hospital administrator role in the Papua New Guinea highlands on half her old salary.

In papers filed with the Supreme Court this week by Hobart barrister Audrey Mills, Ms Holden has set out 13 grounds of appeal against Justice Tennent’s ruling.

Among them, it is claimed the judge erred in failing to hold that Ms Holden was entitled to be paid out the balance of her contract and also failed to find she was entitled to damages for the lost opportunity of a new five-year contract.

Ms Holden’s appeal seeks to have the original judgment wholly set aside and replaced with a ruling that the appellant’s claim for damages be assessed by the court and the Government pay costs.

AWPTI - workplace investigation Sydney and through-out NSW, QLD and Victoria. Workplace training national wide


Misconduct investigations, bullying investigations, harassment investigations & sexual harassment investigations, complaint investigations, grievance investigations, discrimination investigations




Labels:
Location: Sydney NSW, Australia

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Unfair dismissal – harsh to dismiss, however reinstatement not appropriate

In the recent decision of  Paul Johnson v BHP Billiton Olympic Dam Corporation Pty Ltd  [2017] FWC 4097, Commissioner Hampton found that, although the employee had engaged in misconduct constituting a valid reason for dismissal, the dismissal was nevertheless harsh due to a number of mitigating factors. However, the Commissioner did not consider reinstatement appropriate because the employer had a rational basis for its loss of trust and confidence in the employee given the importance of the need for compliance with safety policy and the maintenance of appropriate discipline in connection with workplace health and safety matters. The employee was instead awarded compensation. The facts The employee was employed by BHPB from 24 May 2001 until his dismissal on 31 March 2017. At the time of his dismissal, the employee was a process specialist, responsible for a team of technicians looking after a flash furnace and other equipment in areas of a smelting facility at an und...
Post a Comment
Read more

Lorna Jane vindicated after two-year, $570,000 bullying case

Legal experts are urging businesses to train their staff in up-to-date social media policies this year, after activewear brand Lorna Jane won a two-year legal battle in November against a former employee who claimed the company was responsible for the psychiatric impacts of bullying at work. Former Brisbane store manager Amy Robinson filed a legal claim against Lorna Jane in 2015, seeking $570,000 in damages. The former manager claimed Lorna Jane was negligent and should be held responsible for her being bullied by a learning and development manager at the company, which led to psychiatric illness and a loss of employment and future employability. The company came out swinging against the claims early on,   posting a later-deleted Facebook post in 2015 defending itself against the claims  and saying it had been “very disappointed” by what had been reported in the media about the case. The claims included that Robinson was bullied and called a variety of names while...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stop-bullying application rejected

An employee who claimed his new team leader micromanaged and bullied him has had his stop-bullying application rejected, after the Fair Work Commission found her behaviour "abrupt" but not repeated or unreasonable. The Bunnings Warehouse employee claimed that in May 2016 the new team leader asked him about his face – the left side of his face "droops" and he is unable to move his left arm – which he found "deeply disrespectful and hurtful". A few weeks later, the team leader on two occasions confronted him and questioned why he was in different sections of the store, he told the Commission, noting he believed he was being singled out and treated differently from colleagues. He contacted the store manager to discuss the issue but was told she was too busy to speak with him, and he subsequently took two days off because of work-related stress. The employee claimed that when he returned to work, the employer suspended him but didn't tell him wh...
Post a Comment
Read more