Skip to main content

Rail Employee’s Dismissal Valid Due to Serious Bullying Behaviour

Rail Employee’s Dismissal Valid Due to Serious Bullying Behaviour

A Rail Tram and Bus Union representative, who was fired for allegedly bullying and harassing colleagues, has lost her unfair dismissal case. Samantha Rombola was employed as a Passenger Service Assistant. Ms Rombola’s employment was terminated on 29 July 2016 after an investigation into five allegations of misconduct.
The Rail Commissioner found that four of the five allegations of misconduct were substantiated. The first instance of misconduct involved Ms Rombola treating colleagues in a disrespectful manner. The Rail Commissioner found that Ms Rombola had made a number of disrespectful comments about her colleagues including a female colleague who had been promoted.

It was found that Ms Rombola said words to the effect of: “that f***ing bitch only got the job because she worked at the Port with Rocky” and “who was she rooting to get that job”. Other instances of misconduct that Ms Rombola engaged in, included: failing to comply with a reasonable and lawful managerial direction, taking a personal phone call whilst on duty and treating a passenger in a disrespectful and discourteous manner. These instances of misconduct were considered to be contrary to the Professional Conduct Standards of the Code of Ethics.

The Rail Commissioner found that Ms Rombola “acted inappropriately and acted in a belligerent, intimidating and unprofessional manner” towards her colleagues and a member of the public, and recommended her termination.
The Fair Work Commission held that Ms Rombola’s conduct provided her employer with a valid reason for her dismissal. In his judgment, Commissioner Hampton stated:

“The conduct as demonstrated by the evidence was more than bad language. The tone and manner of the comments and the associated conduct was clearly unreasonable and properly described as serious bullying, even in a robust workplace where inappropriate language was common and tensions between employees were known to exist.”
Commissioner Hampton noted that Ms Rombola’s conduct “was not consistent with the relevant policies and the reasonable expectations within the workplace” and “undermined the necessary trust and confidence in the workplace, […] significantly impact[ing] upon working relationships with management and with other employees.” The FWC held that Ms Rombola’s dismissal was not harsh, unjust or unreasonable and ordered the dismissal of the application.
Labels:
Location: Sydney NSW, Australia

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Unfair dismissal – harsh to dismiss, however reinstatement not appropriate

In the recent decision of  Paul Johnson v BHP Billiton Olympic Dam Corporation Pty Ltd  [2017] FWC 4097, Commissioner Hampton found that, although the employee had engaged in misconduct constituting a valid reason for dismissal, the dismissal was nevertheless harsh due to a number of mitigating factors. However, the Commissioner did not consider reinstatement appropriate because the employer had a rational basis for its loss of trust and confidence in the employee given the importance of the need for compliance with safety policy and the maintenance of appropriate discipline in connection with workplace health and safety matters. The employee was instead awarded compensation. The facts The employee was employed by BHPB from 24 May 2001 until his dismissal on 31 March 2017. At the time of his dismissal, the employee was a process specialist, responsible for a team of technicians looking after a flash furnace and other equipment in areas of a smelting facility at an und...
Post a Comment
Read more

Lorna Jane vindicated after two-year, $570,000 bullying case

Legal experts are urging businesses to train their staff in up-to-date social media policies this year, after activewear brand Lorna Jane won a two-year legal battle in November against a former employee who claimed the company was responsible for the psychiatric impacts of bullying at work. Former Brisbane store manager Amy Robinson filed a legal claim against Lorna Jane in 2015, seeking $570,000 in damages. The former manager claimed Lorna Jane was negligent and should be held responsible for her being bullied by a learning and development manager at the company, which led to psychiatric illness and a loss of employment and future employability. The company came out swinging against the claims early on,   posting a later-deleted Facebook post in 2015 defending itself against the claims  and saying it had been “very disappointed” by what had been reported in the media about the case. The claims included that Robinson was bullied and called a variety of names while...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stop-bullying application rejected

An employee who claimed his new team leader micromanaged and bullied him has had his stop-bullying application rejected, after the Fair Work Commission found her behaviour "abrupt" but not repeated or unreasonable. The Bunnings Warehouse employee claimed that in May 2016 the new team leader asked him about his face – the left side of his face "droops" and he is unable to move his left arm – which he found "deeply disrespectful and hurtful". A few weeks later, the team leader on two occasions confronted him and questioned why he was in different sections of the store, he told the Commission, noting he believed he was being singled out and treated differently from colleagues. He contacted the store manager to discuss the issue but was told she was too busy to speak with him, and he subsequently took two days off because of work-related stress. The employee claimed that when he returned to work, the employer suspended him but didn't tell him wh...
Post a Comment
Read more