Skip to main content

Anti-social media: 4 ways to manage social media and cyber-bullying in the workplace

Whilst technology and social media have unquestionably provided many benefits to the modern workplace and opportunities for businesses to reach a wider audience, they have also presented dilemmas for HR managers and business owners when dealing with interactions between employees. 

With the increased use of the internet and social media, and the fact that almost everyone in the workplace now owns a smart phone and can access Facebook, Instagram and similar social media platforms 24/7, problems that used to be left at work when the day ended and everyone went home now follow people home after work hours, which can present huge challenges for employees and managers alike.

With 66% of the Australian population now on Facebook, 20% on Instagram and 17% on Snapchati, social media has become a huge part of many people's lives. The impact that social media bullying has on children and teenagers has been well publicised, with many schools now introducing programs to educate students about cyber safety. However, the impact that social media and in particular, social media bullying has on workplaces has received far less attention.

In the last few years, social media has played a much larger role in bullying claims, unfair dismissal applications and workers compensation claims, with it now not being unusual for screenshots of social media conversations, statuses and comments to make their way to tribunals and Courts in support of employee's claims.

Whilst many businesses are now taking steps to address bullying and harassment in the workplace, businesses should also be putting steps in place to address employee's use of social media in and away from the workplace and implementing processes for employees to report anti social behaviour that they may be subjected to from other employees when using social media.

4 steps for employers to manage social media bullying
Social media and cyber bullying is often unfamiliar territory for many employers, however, there are steps that can be taken to minimise legal risk and ensure that the workplace is a safe environment for all employees.

  1. Implement workplace policies
The best action that employers can take is to develop bullying, cyber bullying and social media policies. A policy relating to bullying should include a definition and examples of both bullying and cyber bullying as well as what behaviour is appropriate and acceptable and what behaviour is not. The bullying and cyber bullying policy should make clear the consequences for failing to comply with it, such as warnings, suspension or termination.

Employers should emphasise that the conduct does not need to occur specifically at work. The Fair Work Commission has recognised that technology and social media has blurred the line between what is "at work" and what is not.

In Bowker & Others v DP World Melbourne Limited [2014] FWCFB 9227, the Commission held that the traditional meaning of "at work" may not necessarily apply to a cyber bully as comments made on social media (in this case, Facebook) only need to be accessed whilst the employee is "at work" to enable the employee to make an application for a stop bullying order under the Fair Work Act. This means that as long as the comments remain on social media and the employee is able to access those comments whilst they are at work, the employee will have the ability to make a bullying complaint to the Commission.

For this reason, workplace policies that are implemented must adequately address the fact that they will continue to apply even outside working hours and that employee's will be expected to comply with the policy, otherwise disciplinary action may be taken against them.

When it comes to social media and the workplace, it is not just words that may be considered cyber bullying, but also a person's actions. In Rachael Roberts v VIEW Launceston Pty Ltd [2015] FWC 6556, it was held that "unfriending" a colleague on Facebook could be considered to form part of bullying conduct. However, "unfriending" on its own is unlikely to constitute bullying, as in this case, it was the combination of other conduct that led to the Commission finding that the employee had been bullied.
  1. Develop a reporting and investigation process
Each workplace should develop a thorough reporting process and investigation process which is usually set out in a grievance policy. Because of the nature of cyber bullying, and the potential for it to occur outside of working hours, often the only way that employers become aware of any issues is if the employee tells them.

It is important to ensure that employees feel comfortable reporting issues to their supervisors and/or managers and that they are encouraged to do so. This means that supervisors and managers must deal with a complaint appropriately by listening, asking questions and showing empathy.

Having a policy that allows complaints to be made is vital to avoiding a bullying application being made by an employee. The Fair Work Commission expects that prior to making an application, the employee has exhausted avenues available to them to have the complaint remedied by their employer. If a business does not have a grievance policy in place, this can open the door to an employee making an application directly to the Commission without first providing the business with the opportunity to address the issue directly.
  1. Train managers and staff
Employers have a legal obligation to provide a safe workplace for their employees. This includes training and educating their employees regarding bullying and cyber bullying and what is and isn't acceptable behaviour in the workplace.

If a business fails to train its staff on what is and isn't acceptable, and an employee subsequently bullies another staff member, a business can be held liable for the employee's actions. For this reason, it is vital that all staff are given training on appropriate behaviour in the workplace and how to deal with bullying and cyber bullying in the workplace. This will also assist in countering any claim that the employer is vicariously liable for an employee's actions as it demonstrates that the behaviour was not condoned by the business and the business took reasonable steps to train staff about expected behaviour.
  1. Don't ignore the issue
If a business does become aware that there is an issue between staff members or that comments or posts have been made on social media that are inappropriate, the business has an obligation to take immediate steps to address the issue.

Despite there being a tendency to want to ignore issues that crop up on social media given they can be tricky to handle, usually apply to out of work conduct and can sometimes involve petty disputes, if a business is on notice that there is something wrong and does nothing about it, there is a very strong possibility that the employer could be liable for any damage that is caused to the bullied employee's health, if a claim were to be brought by them.
Originally published at - Mondaq.com
http://www.mondaq.com/australia/x/600224/Health+Safety/Antisocial+media+4+ways+to+manage+social+media+and+cyberbullying+in+the+workplace

This is general information only. It does not replace advice from a qualified legal professional or workplace investigator in your state or territory.  It is recommended that should you encounter issues in the workplace that you seek advice from suitability qualified and experienced legal professional or workplace investigators.

AWPTI - workplace investigation Sydney and through-out NSW, QLD and Victoria. Workplace training national wide
Misconduct investigations, bullying investigations, harassment investigations & sexual harassment investigations, complaint investigations, grievance investigations, discrimination investigations


www.awpti.com.au
http://awpti.com.au/investigations/
http://awpti.com.au/training/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Unfair dismissal – harsh to dismiss, however reinstatement not appropriate

In the recent decision of  Paul Johnson v BHP Billiton Olympic Dam Corporation Pty Ltd  [2017] FWC 4097, Commissioner Hampton found that, although the employee had engaged in misconduct constituting a valid reason for dismissal, the dismissal was nevertheless harsh due to a number of mitigating factors. However, the Commissioner did not consider reinstatement appropriate because the employer had a rational basis for its loss of trust and confidence in the employee given the importance of the need for compliance with safety policy and the maintenance of appropriate discipline in connection with workplace health and safety matters. The employee was instead awarded compensation. The facts The employee was employed by BHPB from 24 May 2001 until his dismissal on 31 March 2017. At the time of his dismissal, the employee was a process specialist, responsible for a team of technicians looking after a flash furnace and other equipment in areas of a smelting facility at an und...

Lorna Jane vindicated after two-year, $570,000 bullying case

Legal experts are urging businesses to train their staff in up-to-date social media policies this year, after activewear brand Lorna Jane won a two-year legal battle in November against a former employee who claimed the company was responsible for the psychiatric impacts of bullying at work. Former Brisbane store manager Amy Robinson filed a legal claim against Lorna Jane in 2015, seeking $570,000 in damages. The former manager claimed Lorna Jane was negligent and should be held responsible for her being bullied by a learning and development manager at the company, which led to psychiatric illness and a loss of employment and future employability. The company came out swinging against the claims early on,   posting a later-deleted Facebook post in 2015 defending itself against the claims  and saying it had been “very disappointed” by what had been reported in the media about the case. The claims included that Robinson was bullied and called a variety of names while...

Stop-bullying application rejected

An employee who claimed his new team leader micromanaged and bullied him has had his stop-bullying application rejected, after the Fair Work Commission found her behaviour "abrupt" but not repeated or unreasonable. The Bunnings Warehouse employee claimed that in May 2016 the new team leader asked him about his face – the left side of his face "droops" and he is unable to move his left arm – which he found "deeply disrespectful and hurtful". A few weeks later, the team leader on two occasions confronted him and questioned why he was in different sections of the store, he told the Commission, noting he believed he was being singled out and treated differently from colleagues. He contacted the store manager to discuss the issue but was told she was too busy to speak with him, and he subsequently took two days off because of work-related stress. The employee claimed that when he returned to work, the employer suspended him but didn't tell him wh...