Skip to main content

Have you been the victim of workplace bullying?

When children are experiencing bullying in the playground, or our teens are being bullied across social media, we feel outrage and as a community, we tend to rally behind the victims, advocating for their rights to exist in a world free from victimisation and harassment. 
We understand that the emotional, psychological and physical impact of bullying changes the brain chemistry of our children and can impact the way they perceive themselves and the world. Research out of Yale University indicates that bullied victims are seven to nine per cent more likely to consider suicide. We run anti-bullying programs in schools. And yet, when we grow up and enter the workplace, our staunch advocacy for bully victims is silenced.
Workplace bullying is defined as repeated ‘unreasonable behaviour’ directed towards a worker or a group of workers resulting in a risk to health and safety. It often involves an abuse of power and the incidents of bullying are deliberate and targeted with the intent of causing distress.
As adults, we fear being seen as weak, we are afraid of retribution and making the situation worse, and we worry that by acknowledging that we are experiencing bullying, we are admitting a personal failure. For many of us, we suffer it in silence and often, the situation continues to get worse until our performance is impacted so severely that we find ourselves in disciplinary action, or worse, out the door.
The impact of bullying in the workplace is widespread. Beyond the emotional, psychological and physical consequences that the individual feels, repercussions are felt throughout the organisation, with lowered productivity, disruption and broken relationships, together with heightened absenteeism, staff turnover and related costs. With an estimated cost of the average workplace bullying case for employers numbering $17k-$24k, you would think that genuine prevention would be a priority in the workplace. However, reports indicate that bullying in Australian workplaces continues to be rife.
There are many systems, organisations and watchdogs in place designed to address workplace bullying, and workplace bullying policies are now expected to be included in WHS policies, but even with these in place, employees don’t feel any less alone when faced with a bully. This is largely because the systems and programs that address workplace bullying rarely investigate every claim made, and when they do investigate, they are reportedly handled poorly and are largely focused on the individual rather than the broader systemic problem.
When complaints are made to the relevant state organisation, the investigation focus is on the victim with extensive insurance private investigations and surveillance undertaken, repeated compulsory visits to psychiatrists for assessment after assessment, resulting in victims feeling further victimised, harassed, stalked and at fault while their mental and physical health spirals.
It is time that we stood up for our adult members of our community as much as we do for our children. It’s not okay to be bullied at school, online or at work and we need to start positive conversations of support for those of us experiencing bullying in the workplace and advocating for the rights of our colleagues while demanding organisations be held accountable for their duty of care to their staff. If you or someone you care about needs support, call Lifeline on 13 11 14.
Originally published by - Zoë Wundenberg, www.impressability.com.au
AWPTI - workplace investigation Sydney and through-out NSW, QLD and Victoria. Workplace training national wide


Misconduct investigations, bullying investigations, harassment investigations & sexual harassment investigations, complaint investigations, grievance investigations, discrimination investigations
www.awpti.com.au
http://awpti.com.au/investigations/
http://awpti.com.au/training/
Labels:
Location: Sydney NSW, Australia

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Unfair dismissal – harsh to dismiss, however reinstatement not appropriate

In the recent decision of  Paul Johnson v BHP Billiton Olympic Dam Corporation Pty Ltd  [2017] FWC 4097, Commissioner Hampton found that, although the employee had engaged in misconduct constituting a valid reason for dismissal, the dismissal was nevertheless harsh due to a number of mitigating factors. However, the Commissioner did not consider reinstatement appropriate because the employer had a rational basis for its loss of trust and confidence in the employee given the importance of the need for compliance with safety policy and the maintenance of appropriate discipline in connection with workplace health and safety matters. The employee was instead awarded compensation. The facts The employee was employed by BHPB from 24 May 2001 until his dismissal on 31 March 2017. At the time of his dismissal, the employee was a process specialist, responsible for a team of technicians looking after a flash furnace and other equipment in areas of a smelting facility at an und...
Post a Comment
Read more

Lorna Jane vindicated after two-year, $570,000 bullying case

Legal experts are urging businesses to train their staff in up-to-date social media policies this year, after activewear brand Lorna Jane won a two-year legal battle in November against a former employee who claimed the company was responsible for the psychiatric impacts of bullying at work. Former Brisbane store manager Amy Robinson filed a legal claim against Lorna Jane in 2015, seeking $570,000 in damages. The former manager claimed Lorna Jane was negligent and should be held responsible for her being bullied by a learning and development manager at the company, which led to psychiatric illness and a loss of employment and future employability. The company came out swinging against the claims early on,   posting a later-deleted Facebook post in 2015 defending itself against the claims  and saying it had been “very disappointed” by what had been reported in the media about the case. The claims included that Robinson was bullied and called a variety of names while...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stop-bullying application rejected

An employee who claimed his new team leader micromanaged and bullied him has had his stop-bullying application rejected, after the Fair Work Commission found her behaviour "abrupt" but not repeated or unreasonable. The Bunnings Warehouse employee claimed that in May 2016 the new team leader asked him about his face – the left side of his face "droops" and he is unable to move his left arm – which he found "deeply disrespectful and hurtful". A few weeks later, the team leader on two occasions confronted him and questioned why he was in different sections of the store, he told the Commission, noting he believed he was being singled out and treated differently from colleagues. He contacted the store manager to discuss the issue but was told she was too busy to speak with him, and he subsequently took two days off because of work-related stress. The employee claimed that when he returned to work, the employer suspended him but didn't tell him wh...
Post a Comment
Read more